Crowdsourcing punishment: Individuals reference group preferences to inform their own punitive decisions
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Punitive preferences, monetary incentives and tacit coordination in the punishment of defectors promote cooperation in humans
Peer-punishment is effective in promoting cooperation, but the costs associated with punishing defectors often exceed the benefits for the group. It has been argued that centralized punishment institutions can overcome the detrimental effects of peer-punishment. However, this argument presupposes the existence of a legitimate authority and leaves an unresolved gap in the transition from peer-pu...
متن کاملInforming Consumers about their own Preferences ∗
We analyze a model of monopolistic price discrimination where only some consumers are originally sufficiently informed about their preferences, e.g., about their future demand for a utility such as electricity or telecommunication. When more consumers become informed, we show that this benefits also those consumers who remain uninformed, as it reduces the firm’s incentives to extract informatio...
متن کاملForecasts of Violence to Inform Sentencing Decisions
Behavioral forecasts have informed parole decisions in the United States since the 1920’s (Borden, 1928; Burgess, 1928). Over the decades, these forecasts have increasingly relied on quantitative methods that some would call actuarial (Messinger and Berk, 1987; Feely and Simon, 1994). Despite jurisprudential concerns and forecasting accuracy that has been di cult to evaluate (Farrington, 2003; ...
متن کاملLearning Player Preferences to Inform Delayed Authoring
Of all forms of Intelligent Narrative, interactive narratives are uniquely well-poised to benefit from player modelling techniques. Given the availability of immediate player feedback as interactions with the narrative’s world, the traditional task of delayed authoring can be informed with the author’s knowledge of which types of players should prefer each event; this allows generated narrative...
متن کاملDeliberation About Preferences and Group Decisions (Doctoral Consortium)
Our research consists of an approach to Group Decision Making in multiagent systems that is inspired by human interaction. The main goal of the thesis is to evaluate how engaging in deliberation can help a group of agents to improve their decisions. In order to achieve that, we proposed a model of preferences that allows arguing about them and a protocol of deliberation which is inherently coll...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Scientific Reports
سال: 2019
ISSN: 2045-2322
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-48050-2